Clinton Impeachment Essay Research Paper ABOVE THE free essay sample

Clinton Impeachment Essay, Research Paper ABOVE THE LAW? As the impeachment test draws to an terminal there is much contention about conditions or non President Clinton should be impeached. Many say yes and many say no. The President of the United States should be one of the most influential work forces in our society, sing the fact that he represents this state before the universe leaders. Wouldn # 8217 ; T you like to cognize that your representative was a jurisprudence staying citizen of the United States? So if he is a jurisprudence staying citizen shouldn # 8217 ; t the President of the United States be held to the same Torahs and penalty as your norm Joe? Or possibly on a rigorous footing sing that, once more I province, he is this states representative that negotiates with other universe powers. ? I do solemnly curse that I will dependably put to death the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and support the Fundamental law of the United States. We will write a custom essay sample on Clinton Impeachment Essay Research Paper ABOVE THE or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page ? This is the curse that Bill Clinton took before he entered the office of President of the United States. And yet he perjured himself in a tribunal of jurisprudence. In Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution explains a impeachable discourtesy as ? # 8230 ; lese majesty, graft or other high offenses and misdemeanors. ? Perjury is a felony. So why is it that people feel the president shouldn? T be impeached, does he stand higher than the Fundamental law? That would be my feeling if I was a alien, that the leader of this state is above than the jurisprudence. Some people say that bearing false witness is non plenty to impeach the president. Yet any normal U.S. citizen would be sent to imprison for a few old ages for lying in tribunal of jurisprudence. How is it that a regular citizen would be sent to gaol and the president does acquire? Fired? from the presidential term. When he takes the curse to go president does he derive certain rights? I Don? t think so. Some people besides say that the obstructor of justness charge is truly ? onionskin? . This is true because the lone manner they could turn out this would be to acquire a testimony from Monica or the others involved. In an art icle I read Monica said that she loved President Clinton wouldn? t anyone in love prevarication to protect the loved 1. So they wouldn? T be able to acquire a testimony against Clinton from Monica. The other people involved are good friends of the President and I know from experience you lie to protect good friends. In some would take the incrimination for their friends. So they wouldn? t acquire a good testimony from any of them either. I think that the bearing false witness should? ve been plenty to impeach Clinton and direct him to imprison as a mean jurisprudence staying citizen of the United States of America. The president should be held to stricter Torahs than the mean American, because he represents all of the American populace in foreign states. This is why we should hold a morally good president so foreign can swear in the word of the U.S. If Bill Clinton? s married woman couldn? t trust him to maintain smaller matrimony vows. Then how can all of the U.S. citizens trust him in the Oath he took when he entered the office or how the foreign very important persons can trust him in dialogues. We need a good moral individual that will maintain to large promises. Clinton broke likely the to biggest vows in his life Wedding vows and the Vow to maintain and implement the Constitution. How can we swear him to maintain the smaller promises? President Clinton should hold been impeached at least for every bit much as we the revenue enhancement remunerators of America spent on the test and attorneies. Something should? ve happened alternatively him acquiring off pretty easy no penalty at all for interrupting the jurisprudence. From an experience I was purportedly smoking and the bull gave me a ticket and a tribunal visual aspect at that place I received a 100 dollar mulct # 8230 ; .for what? And the President can acquire off with bearing false witness with no penalty what so of all time. This sort of illustration is what is, I think, doing the U.S. to make material they think is wholly right because if the President can make it why can? t I? Besides I think that since the president is such an illustration he should be held to a tighter more rigorous set of regulations. I think that is why our sires put misdemeanours in Article 2 Section 4 of the Fundamental law.